Peer Review Process

1. Initial Screening
   The editorial team evaluates the manuscript to ensure it meets the journal's scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical standards.
2. Double-Blind Review
   The manuscript is sent to two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. Both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous to each other to ensure an unbiased review.
3. Reviewer Evaluation
   Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:
   • Originality and novelty
   • Scientific accuracy and methodology
   • Relevance and significance to the field
   • Clarity and coherence of writing
4. Editorial Decision
   Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make one of the following decisions:
   • Accept
   • Minor Revision
   • Major Revision
   • Reject
5. Revision and Resubmission
   If revisions are requested, authors must submit a revised version along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments.
6. Final Decision
   After satisfactory revision, the editor makes the final decision and the article proceeds to copyediting and publication.